Difference between revisions of "Vulcan/MeetingNotes/Aug09 2013"

From Knowitall
Jump to: navigation, search
(Notes)
(Notes)
Line 28: Line 28:
 
** Scalability issues with BLP/MLN  
 
** Scalability issues with BLP/MLN  
  
* Abductive reasoning using linguistically motivated templates.  
+
* What happens when deductive inference fails?
 +
** We find the answer that is most plausible.
 +
*** e.g., (x, helps, a fox find food), where x is one of {sense of smell, thick fur, long tail, pointed teeth}<br/>
 +
 
 +
"sense of smell helps * find food" returns 7 million hits on Google.<br/>
 +
"fur helps * find food" returns no hits.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
** Abductive reasoning using linguistically motivated templates.  
 
** Will be handy when deductive inference fails.
 
** Will be handy when deductive inference fails.
 
** Provides a different form of evidence.
 
** Provides a different form of evidence.

Revision as of 22:18, 9 August 2013

Update

Focusing on system development.
1. Inferencer stub using Jena. Stub takes in axioms and rules and outputs a derviation.
2. Tested stub with axioms and rules that would help us solve the iron nail example.
3. Built Proposition extractor stub that converts the answer assertions into propositions represented as Open IE 4.0 tuples
4. Exploring other triplestore/inference systems (OWLIM and Seasame). Jena API doesn't readily support multiple derivations. Ask Jena community to find out if this is possible.
Resource collection
1. Gathered assertions from Peter/Phil. Each assertion corresponds to a single multiple choice answer.
2. Found RDF representations for WordNet and imported them into Jena.
Analysis
1. Selected 10 propositions that are single Open IE tuples as starting targets.
2. Started to write down steps involved in verifying these propositions.

Notes

  • Do we really needed an inference engine (Jena).
    • Scalability issues with BLP/MLN
  • What happens when deductive inference fails?
    • We find the answer that is most plausible.
      • e.g., (x, helps, a fox find food), where x is one of {sense of smell, thick fur, long tail, pointed teeth}

"sense of smell helps * find food" returns 7 million hits on Google.
"fur helps * find food" returns no hits.


    • Abductive reasoning using linguistically motivated templates.
    • Will be handy when deductive inference fails.
    • Provides a different form of evidence.

Agenda

Things to discuss in the meeting.

  • Axiom extraction and Rules generation -- What is the scope of rules and axioms? We are going to use the target propositions to guide the scope.
  • Stephen had an idea on some form of self-supervision. For e.g.,

The rule (x, type of, metal) AND (metal, conductor of, electricity) -> (x, conductor of, electricity)

can be scored based on instances of x, where Open IE provides support for the consequent.

  • Framework: BLP or MLN?
  • Can we directly use these without Jena? We are using Jena for efficiency purposes. How large can the inference graph be for BLP or MLN?

To Do

System building
1. Create a system architecture page with a figure and overview of the main components.
2. Continue system building.
  • Create a derivation scorer stub. This will be replaced with a MLN or a BLP scorer.
  • Test with iron nail example.
3. Jena API doesn't readily support multiple derivations.
  • Ask Jena community to find out if this is possible.
  • See if OWLIM can be used as a replacement.
4. Try out Tuffy MLN implemenatation.
  • Use output of iron nail example
  • If easy to use write wrappers around Tuffy to hook into our system.
5 Write evaluation code.
  • Check with Peter.
Resource Collection
Experiments