Difference between revisions of "Vulcan/HandlingGaps"
From Knowitall
(→Problem Overview) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | This page outlines possible solutions for handling gaps in inference. | + | This page outlines possible solutions for handling gaps in inference. <span style="background-color:yellow"><b>Unfinished.</b></span> |
== Problem Overview == | == Problem Overview == | ||
Latest revision as of 18:53, 10 September 2013
This page outlines possible solutions for handling gaps in inference. Unfinished.
Problem Overview
Inference using textual evidence will have gaps due to lexical variations. Consider the following example:
Proposition:
Iron nail is a good conductor of electricity.
Evidence:
E1: (metals, have the ability to conduct, electricity)
E2: composed(iron nail, iron)
E3: Type(iron, metal)
E4: (metal, conducts, electricity)
Rules:
R1: composed(x, y) (y, R, z) => (x, R, z)
