Difference between revisions of "Vulcan/MeetingNotes/Aug16 2013"
From Knowitall
(→Update) |
(→Update) |
||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
: 2. Wrote down [http://homes.cs.washington.edu/~niranjan/vulcan/aug09/stepsinvolved.docx steps involved] in verifying these propositions. | : 2. Wrote down [http://homes.cs.washington.edu/~niranjan/vulcan/aug09/stepsinvolved.docx steps involved] in verifying these propositions. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Agenda == | ||
| + | |||
| + | == To Do (Copied over from previous week) == | ||
Revision as of 06:57, 16 August 2013
Update
- Focusing on system development.
- 1. Online components implemented. See System development status for details.
- Proposition generator
- Evidence finder -- Tuple matching over Open IE Clueweb data.
- 2. Components tested using ...
- 3. Evaluation...
- Vulcan has a good evaluation interface setup. We will use this for starters.
- Design questions.
- 1. Why not use MLN directly? Why use a backward chained inferencer (such as Jena) as an intermediate step?
- Looks like a separte backward-chained inferencer won't be necessary.
- Tuffy, an MLN implementation, does KBMC to scale MLN inference. Details [1]
- Analysis
- 1. Selected 10 propositions that are single Open IE tuples as starting targets.
- 2. Wrote down steps involved in verifying these propositions.
