Difference between revisions of "Vulcan/TupleRepresentation"

From Knowitall
Jump to: navigation, search
(Examples)
(Motivation)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Motivation ==  
 
== Motivation ==  
* In designing output for extraction from definition sentences, it is useful to use both nested and n-ary tuples. Here are some examples.
 
 
 
* For deep understanding and reasoning, we want high coverage of the information in each sentence. Current Open IE often misses much of the information in a given sentence.   
 
* For deep understanding and reasoning, we want high coverage of the information in each sentence. Current Open IE often misses much of the information in a given sentence.   
  
* The nested and n-ary representation will make inference rules more compact. Without nesting, a single sentence is represented as two separate tuples; without n-ary, a single sentence becomes multiple tuples, some of which don't make much sense on their own. 
+
* Vulcan propositions we are trying to prove and the definition sentences we use for evidence are often nested or n-ary.
 
 
* We expect inference rules will be easier to express and easier to learn if they operate on nested and n-ary tuples, rather than the sets of binary tuples that are equivalent to the nested or n-ary tuples.
 
  
* The sample Vulcan propositions we are trying to prove are often nested or n-ary.
+
* The nested and n-ary representation will make inference rules more compact. Without nesting, a single sentence is represented as two separate tuples; without n-ary, a single sentence becomes multiple tuples, some of which don't make much sense on their own.
  
 
== Examples ==
 
== Examples ==

Revision as of 21:02, 3 September 2013

Motivation

  • For deep understanding and reasoning, we want high coverage of the information in each sentence. Current Open IE often misses much of the information in a given sentence.
  • Vulcan propositions we are trying to prove and the definition sentences we use for evidence are often nested or n-ary.
  • The nested and n-ary representation will make inference rules more compact. Without nesting, a single sentence is represented as two separate tuples; without n-ary, a single sentence becomes multiple tuples, some of which don't make much sense on their own.

Examples

Definitions
Example1:

Adaptation helps an organism survive in its environment
Pattern: X rel1 Y rel2 Z

Open IE 4.0 represents this as triples:
(adaptation; helps; organism survive in its environment)
(organism; survive; in its environment)

Should we make the nested tuple explicit:
(adaptation; helps; (organism; survive; in its environment))

Note that the nested form can be recovered from the pair of triples.

Example2:
The kidneys filter waste materials out of the blood
Pattern: X rel Y prep Z

Open IE 4.0 represents this as  an n-ary tuple:
(The kidneys; filter; waste materials; out of the blood)

Note that additional arguments in n-ary tuples always(?) begin with a preposition.
Propositions
	1. "A turtle eating worms is an example of taking in nutrients"
	((turtle, eat, worms);  is;  example of (turtle; take in; nutrients))

	2. "Growth causes the leaves of a plant to become larger"
	(growth;  cause;  (leaves of plant;  become;  larger))    

	3. "A sense of smell helps a fox find food"
	(sense of smell;  help;  (fox;  find;  food))

	4. "Gravity pulls the marble to the bottom of the glass"
	(gravity;  pull;  marble;  to bottom of glass)

Examples 2 and 3 are nested; 1 has a complex nesting; 4 is n-ary. Example 1 also has sentence internal coreference to get (turtle; take in; nutrients).